The correction of global stock markets that we have witnessed in the past month due to the war in the Middle East has also affected the domestic stock market. From February 27, the day before the US-Israeli attack on Iran, until Thursday, March 26, the CROBEX index weakened by 3.8 percent. Despite this, the Zagreb Stock Exchange index is still in the positive for this year, albeit modestly, by 0.25 percent. Compared to other European markets, the Middle Eastern crisis has had a very mild impact on the Croatian stock exchange. For example, the Eurostoxx 600 index has lost more than seven percent of its value since the beginning of the war, the French CAC 9.5, and the German DAX even 10.5 percent.
However, two stocks that are the latest additions to the Zagreb Stock Exchange, Žito and Tokić, have completely avoided the correction. The agricultural-food company owned by Marko Pipunić has increased by five percent on the stock exchange since February 27, rising to 19.70 euros. On the other hand, the leading domestic distributor of automotive parts rose to 18 euros by March 18, but then followed a series of six consecutive ‘red’ trading days during which the price fell to 16.40 euros. Despite this, Tokić’s monthly decline of 0.6 percent is far less than the overall market decline indicated by the CROBEX.
Still Below the IPO Price
This can be attributed to the defensive nature of the operations of these two companies. It is known that the food sector is generally resistant to crises, and the same goes for the sale of spare parts, as few people decide to purchase a new car during times of crisis.
This has partially mitigated the losses of these two stocks since they went public in last year’s IPOs. To recall, Žito raised 130 million euros in the largest Croatian IPO, selling shares at 20.30 euros. Those who bought Žito in the IPO are currently at a loss of just under three percent. The stock began trading on July 28 last year, and in these eight months, it was above the IPO price for 37 trading days, from early August to early October.
In mid-September, the highest price in regular trading was recorded at 22.30 euros, which was 9.8 percent above the IPO price. Since the beginning of October, the Žito stock has been below the IPO price, with the lowest price achieved on March 9 at 17.55 euros. Those who bought shares in the public offering were at a loss of 13.5 percent at that moment.
Tokić’s IPO last autumn was far more modest, raising just over 23 million euros. Shares were sold at 20.20 euros, the lowest target price. Tokić was listed on November 20, so investors who participated in the public offering are down nearly 19 percent. Looking at the closing price, this stock has not managed to break above the IPO price so far. Moreover, it ended its first trading day with a loss of half a percent. The highest closing price of 20.2 euros, equal to the IPO price, was achieved on December 12, and on March 3, the lowest was 15.80 euros.
Temporary Costs
The listing experience has shown that analysts and observers who believed before the IPO that Tokić’s valuations compared to competitors (such as CIAK and Auto Hrvatske) were quite high were correct. In other words, Tokić’s stock in the IPO was relatively expensive. Moreover, despite the price drop after going public, it still has relatively high valuations.
For example, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, according to data from the 2025 report and the current stock price, is 14.9. In other words, investors are currently paying almost 15 euros for one euro of Tokić’s earnings. The ratio for CIAK is at 11.8, and for Auto Hrvatske at the most favorable 9.8. Tokić’s P/E is higher because net profit was halved last year to 4.65 million euros. The decline is due to pressure from several factors.
First and foremost, the most controversial move before the IPO, the separation of real estate. Since April 1 last year, Tokić’s stores have been separated into a separate company, Nek-Tok, after which the Group uses them through leasing. It should be emphasized that the decision to separate real estate is legitimate, and there are numerous examples of companies that have opted for such a transaction before selling the business itself through an IPO. The application of accounting standards related to this lease resulted in an additional increase in depreciation and financial costs of 1.4 million euros in 2025.
