Home / Business and Politics / It Would Be Better for Our Economy to Depend on the Pharmaceutical Industry Rather Than Tourism

It Would Be Better for Our Economy to Depend on the Pharmaceutical Industry Rather Than Tourism

Medications primarily intended for the treatment of diabetes have been a big hit in the pharmaceutical market for several years now, after it was discovered that they achieve excellent results in weight loss. The most well-known among them, Ozempic, is so successful that its sales determine whether the Danish economy will grow or fall into crisis. The potential of this drug, or its active substance semaglutide, is much broader and could even treat Parkinson’s disease in the future. The general public is unaware that the patents for these so-called GLP-1 drugs will soon expire. This means that other pharmaceutical companies will soon be able to produce them. A recent analysis by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) published last autumn showed the opportunities that are opening up for the domestic pharmaceutical industry. On this occasion, we spoke with the principal of BCG’s Zagreb office, Sanya Eduarda Kužet. Originally from Zadar, she obtained her doctorate in molecular biology in France after studying in Zagreb. She has been with BCG for the past six years.

Patents for some obesity treatment drugs will soon expire. Which drugs are those, and is the most well-known, Ozempic, among them?

– Yes, in that group are Ozempic and Mounjaro as the main drugs that hold the entire obesity treatment market, at least so far. They are also direct competitors: Ozempic is produced by Novo Nordisk, while Mounjaro is produced by the American company Eli Lilly. Their patent rights are expected to expire as early as 2026 in Canada, while in the United States and Europe, the patent expiration is expected in 2031.

What will this mean for the global pharmaceutical industry?

– The expiration of patent rights is an extremely important moment, but what is happening in the market at this moment is also important. Every pharmaceutical company wants a piece of that pie because by 2030, the obesity treatment market could be worth around a hundred billion dollars, according to estimates. Everyone wants at least two to three percent of that market, which is why many are preparing to enter that race. If you look at the smaller acquisitions happening in the market, all the major players have started to take positions. Roche has had two important acquisitions in the last two years, and Pfizer won the battle with Novo Nordisk for the acquisition of Metsera worth ten billion dollars. Other major pharmaceutical players are also considering entering that market. Therefore, we expect significant market fragmentation, but the question is whether all these players will get their share. When we talk about the expiration of patent rights, opportunities open up for other companies, such as Teva and other large generic manufacturers. They will certainly want to take a part of that market, which will reduce the prices of these drugs and increase their availability. By 2040, such generics could hold up to 40 percent of the market, which is a very large share, especially if such drugs are taken orally, unlike the current ones that are injected, which is not the most pleasant solution for some patients.

What drives such demand for Ozempic, Mounjaro, and similar drugs?

– There are three key factors influencing the increasing demand for obesity medications. The first is patient interest, who are increasingly obtaining medications through private channels where they are not covered by insurance. This is most often the case in countries where obesity is not recognized as a chronic disease. For example, in Germany, it is still classified as a lifestyle issue. However, the views of health authorities are changing, and at BCG, we expect that therapy coverage will expand to patients with a high body mass index or comorbidities related to obesity by 2030. Recently, we have seen a significant shift in the U.S. and an agreement between the U.S. government and Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly – they will reduce prices, but in return, they will gain access to a larger number of patients through regulatory changes.

The second key factor is the innovation of the pharmaceutical industry. Already, GLP-1 therapy allows for a weight loss of between 15 and 25 percent, which is close to the results of bariatric surgery, and their effectiveness for an expanding range of conditions and the prevention of chronic diseases is already being researched. The third key factor is the industry’s focus on increasing accessibility, availability, and economies of scale in production, and one of the most important steps in that direction is the imminent arrival of generic versions of GLP-1 drugs. This will pressure manufacturers to deliver high-quality drugs in large quantities, but also put pressure on the entire value chain, from regulatory approvals to production and distribution.

How much is the domestic or regional market for such drugs worth, what do estimates say?

– The question is how aware people are that they can access this medication and, if they are, do they know how many tests need to be done beforehand to be prescribed such a drug for use in treating obesity if they do not suffer from diabetes. There are no reliable data on the value of the domestic market, but it is interesting that Novo Nordisk reported that there is a 40 percent shortage of Ozempic in the German market, even though the produced and marketed quantities should be sufficient according to the number of diabetics. This means that people are taking the medication on their own. Therefore, the question is how many Croatian citizens are using Ozempic and similar drugs without prior medical tests. The Boston Consulting Group conducted an analysis showing that in the U.S., where doctors are generally quite generous in prescribing medications to patients, 15 percent of the entire market is accounted for by off-label drugs. This raises the question of how pharmaceutical products will be used in the future. For example, Botox was initially not used for wrinkles; it is a neurotoxin used as a treatment for certain diseases – today it can be obtained practically at a dentist’s office. Therefore, it is possible that in the future, Ozempic and similar drugs will be used in the beauty industry rather than primarily in medicine. It will be interesting to see how regulations will develop worldwide, although this region will likely lag behind in that.

You mentioned that all pharmacists are trying to grab that piece of the pie. How much can Croatian pharmaceutical companies grab?

– It depends on how willing they are to invest because, let’s be honest, there is currently no capacity in the region to produce such drugs. This is not even similar to antibiotics like Sumamed; we are talking about much more complex medications. The process of producing GLP-1 drugs is much more complex compared to conventional small molecules. We are dealing with synthetic peptides, for which the requirements in synthesis, purification, characterization, and aseptic final filling are much stricter. Regulators have already issued peptide-specific guidelines and expect extensive analytical and comparable packages, which raises both capital requirements and necessary expertise. In short: larger facilities, stricter processes, stronger CMC teams. It is important to emphasize that there is generally a lack of capacity in the global pharmaceutical industry. If Croatian pharmaceutical companies invest in such capabilities, they do not have to develop their own obesity drug; they can produce it as contract manufacturers for other larger global manufacturers. In this context, this could be a scenario for the Slovenian Lek, which is part of the Sandoz group.

Besides equipment, is there a need to invest in personnel, i.e., knowledge?

– Yes, but in my opinion, we are doing well in that regard. Experts in Croatia and the region are well-educated, and we are still a more cost-effective workforce. Croatia and other Central and Southeast European countries have significant advantages here. The region combines the European culture of good manufacturing practices with cost competitiveness and a strong pool of STEM talent. Countries like Slovenia and the Czech Republic regularly achieve above-average results in science among OECD members, thus creating talent for peptide production, technology transfer, and late-stage development. When you add the momentum of new facilities coming online, an ecosystem is created that is ready for rapid action as soon as patents expire.

If they wanted to, how much would domestic pharmaceutical companies need to invest?

– We are talking about serious amounts. Entering GLP-1 requires new lines for peptide synthesis, high-efficiency purification, and aseptic filling with complete process validation, which usually raises the initial capital cost by 20 to 30 percent compared to classical small molecules. This is compounded by strengthening quality teams, cold chain, and additional space qualifications. However, the global capacity shortage and stable demand open the way for returns within contract manufacturing for originators and generics after patent expirations. The stakes are higher, but the market address is broader.

BCG’s analysis states that regional cooperation among pharmaceutical companies provides an opportunity to start the production of generic versions of obesity drugs in this area. What could this cooperation look like?

– Pliva and Belupo have knowledge in the production of sterile and oral forms of medications that they successfully market in Central and Eastern European markets. In collaboration with Slovenian companies Krka and Lek, which is part of Sandoz, Hungarian Egis, and Czech Zentiva, they could form a regional platform for scaling the production of generic GLP-1 drugs.

Is their cooperation necessary to enter such a business?

– It is not necessary. For example, Teva, as the owner of Pliva, already has plans for a generic that would be used for treating obesity. Krka is a very large player in generics in Europe, and several smaller pharmaceutical companies in Germany are already considering entering this production. Others, even if they are not thinking about it, should start.

The analysis states that everyone in that chain would have some role. For example, Slovenia invests a lot in research and development. What would be Croatia’s role?

– Croatia can take a pragmatic role in industrialization and supply. This would address global bottlenecks in the GLP-1 chain: aseptic fill-finish and packaging of injectable forms, development and validation of analytical methods, and, in the medium term, a niche in assembling pen devices and a distribution hub for the EU for Central and Southeast Europe. The foundation exists; Pliva and Belupo have strong manufacturing and regulatory capacities, and JGL has proven expertise in sterile facilities.

Can such drugs have other applications as well?

– Certainly. The market is growing on the assumption that such drugs will not only be used in the fight against obesity. There is a spectrum of diseases that can be covered by such drugs, from cardiovascular diseases, apnea, liver diseases to neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson’s disease. Given all the potential applications, the possibility that GLP-1 drugs may also have an effect on longevity is increasingly mentioned – perhaps they will become the first drugs approved for slowing aging. Whether this will happen depends on clinical trials. Although we do not yet see it this way in Croatia, obesity is actually a disease that carries many other diseases with it.

How do you interpret the fact that obesity has not yet been recognized as a disease in our health policy?

– We generally like to follow what Western Europe does. Germany has not yet recognized obesity in this way, so there is no motivation for Croatia to do so either. In medical and regulatory circles, there are indications that obesity will be classified as a disease in Germany. However, there will not be significant progress until it is understood that the best approach is prevention, both for patients and for the finances of the healthcare system. We are still very far from a health insurance system that financially encourages healthy lifestyles.

Hypothetically, if Pliva and Belupo entered this production, would we experience what is happening in Denmark, whose economic growth or decline depends on the business results of Novo Nordisk?

– I believe that would not be the case in Croatia. We are far from that, although it would be much better for our economy to depend on the pharmaceutical industry rather than tourism. The pharmaceutical market is more concrete and stable and will grow in the long term. Humanity continues to grow, life expectancy is increasing, therefore pharmaceuticals bring much more added value. Diseases that were not even known twenty years ago are now being treated.

How would you assess the overall competitiveness of the domestic pharmaceutical industry?

– Due to the general aversion to risk, not only in pharmaceuticals but in the entire economy, we often fear moving into something new. In our pharmaceutical industry, there are very few real innovations. Part of the reason is that developing a completely new drug is an endeavor that requires a lot of money for research, and there is a risk that the project will fail. Another reason is the fear of how the market will accept this new product and what price it will achieve. However, domestic pharmacists should not limit themselves to just the domestic market.

Tagged: