Written by: Viktor Mendel, Director and Founder of Strategic Management Consulting (Germany)
Financial departments across all industries are facing significant challenges today. Sudden changes due to digital transformation, unstable market conditions, regulatory complexity, and changing stakeholder expectations require more than incremental improvements – they require fundamental transformation.
The model known as the Finance Target Operating Model (FTOM) provides a structured framework for this journey, but success lies not in the framework itself, but in how organizations navigate the cultural and operational changes it demands.
In this article, I will describe an example of transformation in a sustainable energy services company and demonstrate how the FTOM framework can be practically applied to evolve finance from a service function to a strategic business partner.
More than Transformation
The energy company in question operates in the German-Swiss border region, serving as a regional partner for sustainable energy production and supply. With annual revenues of €1.5 billion and over a thousand employees, the organization faced increasing pressures from climate change initiatives, volatile energy prices, regulatory interventions, and a comprehensive energy transition that reshaped its industry.
Traditional approaches to optimizing the financial function – streamlining processes, implementing new IT systems, reducing costs – were no longer sufficient. The company recognized that it needed a fundamental transformation to ensure that finance, and consequently controlling, could effectively support the strategic evolution of the organization. The company’s approach is an example of how organizations can successfully apply technical upgrades while simultaneously achieving a true cultural and operational transformation of the financial function.
Applying the Golden Circle
The transformation team applied the approach known as the Golden Circle by Simon Sinek, which explains why some organizations are more successful than others. The model consists of three concentric circles: from the ‘why’ circle to ‘how’ to ‘what’. The key idea of this approach is that most organizations communicate from the outer circle inward (what → how → why). Successful organizations do the opposite: from ‘why’ outward (why → how → what). This methodology has proven crucial for creating organizational alignment.
Why, How, and What to Transform
The primary driver was a fundamental shift towards a focus on internal users, primarily management. Finance needed to evolve from a primary focus on mere calculations and compliance to becoming a management partner for effective and transparent management of business units. A focused orientation on the needs of internal users proved to be a key driver of the transformation towards a managerial function.
The introduction was more than just another new concept. ‘How’ encompassed new collaboration models and systems of mutual support, providing a holistic view essential for sustainable change. The focus was on digitization and enhancing finance towards management, positioning them as an integral component of core business, rather than merely as a supportive, service, or administrative function.
Through Thematic Areas
The company organized transformation measures through thematic areas based on process activities, e.g., from procurement to payment or from recording to reporting. This structure enabled a comprehensive understanding of processes while ensuring that measures from one area impacted others. To make the thematic areas as tangible as possible, the company organized concrete steps to help internal users better understand and identify with them.
For example, a concept of open doors was developed for complete interaction with internal users where they could experience the entire process, ask questions, and collaboratively develop solutions, as well as workshops related to specific insights into how data is analyzed in controlling and how data is transformed into information. Such solutions succeeded in making abstract concepts of transformation concrete and accessible, helping a broader range of internal users, especially managers, to understand their roles in the broader change initiative.
From General Practice to Specialists
A key element of FTOM involved introducing a new organization based on roles within the controlling department. Previously, controllers functioned as general practice experts without deep specialization. The transformation introduced specialized roles with defined task profiles and competencies to better meet the demands of internal users.
Instead of imposing roles from above, the finance department worked with controllers to collaboratively design new positions. All other relevant stakeholders were involved in role design through workshops where the requirements of internal users were identified, grouped by task focus, and included in role descriptions. The transformation thus resulted in three different roles in controlling:
1. Business Analyst: focused on digital competencies and expertise, with a strong orientation towards detail and technical precision.
