In just one week, Chinese leader Xi Jinping sent a response to Trump’s initiatives for resetting the world order. First, with a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Tianjin, and then with a large military parade in Beijing in honor of the victory over Japan in World War II.
Both events had the same fundamental messages. First, China is the one that will provide a security-defense umbrella for the Asian continent, and gradually for Europe, which it considers a sort of Asian geopolitical extension. And second, China is the one that will be a bulwark against Western imperialism led by the USA. The question is what is realistic about that. What is the real threat, we would say from the perspective of defending fundamental Western values? And what is merely a convenient show of strength to secure a better position in negotiations for a big deal with Trump’s America?
Lack of Common Values
SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization), founded in 2001 in response to the expansion of NATO and the EU into the former Soviet bloc countries, had the ambition to become the Asian counterpart to NATO under Chinese leadership. Statistically speaking, the summit in Tianjin gathered a truly impressive number (25) of heads of state and government. Alongside host Xi, the most notable name among the participants was Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The best political marketing of the summit was Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which was quickly interpreted as his betrayal of the alliance with Trump and revenge for Trump’s punitive tariffs. Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was also present, formally still a NATO member, while Egyptian President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, a more reliable American ally than Erdoğan despite Egypt not being a NATO member, sent his Prime Minister to the summit. There were also about twenty other heads of state and government from the Asian world that we usually categorize as authoritarian leaders or despots, including Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
However, at first glance, a fundamental obstacle emerges for the SCO to become the Asian NATO – the lack of positive common values. NATO, as a defensive alliance of European states, is based on defending the values of Western (European) democracies against the then-communist revolutions. The only common value among SCO members is opposition to the West, namely the USA. And that opposition ceases when cooperation with the despised West seems a more profitable option. Major SCO members India and Pakistan are in a constant low-intensity war conflict over Kashmir, and Armenia and Azerbaijan are in a similar state over Nagorno-Karabakh.
