Home / Comments and Opinions / Good news for the protection of privacy and freedom from both sides

Good news for the protection of privacy and freedom from both sides

Image by: foto Shutterstock

In a not particularly impressive documentary about Pope John Paul II, which television stations are using to fill their summer schedules, one statement struck me. His personal secretary, Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, recounted how, before the fall of the Berlin Wall, which symbolically marked the end of communism in Europe, officials from the American CIA regularly visited the Pope, bringing precise satellite images of all military and politically relevant sites in the then USSR, from which it was evident that the state was on the brink of collapse.

Even then, enough could be seen. This was 37 years ago, when the internet was still in its infancy in American military ‘laboratories’. Just six years later, in August 1995, when U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright brought satellite images of freshly dug mass graves around Srebrenica to a UN Security Council meeting, the internet was already in use even in Croatia. And it seemed that since then, nothing in this world could really be hidden anymore and that every further intrusion was a potential attack on our privacy.

European, and even Croatian awakening

From today’s perspective, when I greet my mobile phone with ‘Hello, Donald!’, my fridge with ‘Ni hao, Xi!’, and impersonal algorithms not only recognize how my brain works but increasingly manage it, the events, stories, and doubts from the beginning of this column seem like tales from the Stone Age. The internet, the communication revolution, and artificial intelligence are our unavoidable reality, brilliant tools, and unstoppable future.

But have we really become such managed idiots that we apathetically watch as European and our (corrupt) political elites hand over our personal internet communications, as the last refuge of privacy or at least the semblance of privacy, to the impersonal Big Brother for scrutiny and oversight? All this under the guise of fighting against child sexual abuse (CSAM)? Because that is precisely what the document being pushed during the Danish presidency of the EU Council aims to turn into a binding directive for member states.

I would not want to be an unfounded optimist, but it seems that there is good news these days for the protection of the last pockets of privacy and freedom. And this is true on both sides of the ocean. And on both sides of the extremely divided political spectrum. The good news is that the CSAM regulation is becoming a topic in all EU countries, including Croatia. The good news is that the review of this proposed European regulation has more or less the support of all political groups in the European Parliament, and even better is that the left-wing parties are highly critical of the draft regulation, even though this initiative was largely birthed by (former) officials of the European Commission (Margrethe Vestager and Ylva Johansson) who belong to that very political spectrum.

An even better piece of news would be a serious investigation into their possible (financial) ties with American communication corporations. I am particularly pleased that on this wave, the head of the SDP, Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, has bravely joined the campaign criticizing the CSAM regulation, calling out Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for his lukewarm response. If he persisted on the path of protecting fundamental rights and freedoms threatened (not only) by new communication regulations, I believe he would manage to attract many more young voters than by hunting for ‘Ustaše’ in cafes and concerts. It seems that the European, and even Croatian awakening is already a serious barrier to the Danish effort to push such regulation during its presidency.

Conservatives defend the First Amendment

The second piece of good news for the defense of fundamental freedoms comes from the other side of the Atlantic. After President Trump, amid large internal protests from leftist activists against his policies, announced an order that would treat the burning of the American flag as a criminal act of flag desecration, he was attacked by influential conservative commentators, who are otherwise supporters of his MAGA movement.

They have no sympathy for the burning of the American flag; in fact, it is a repugnant act to them. But they firmly defend the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which guarantees everyone freedom of speech, freedom of the press, religious freedoms, the right to peaceful assembly, and opposition to the government. It is particularly important that such reactions come from the right side of the political spectrum, showing where the line is between personal political beliefs and the defense of fundamental democratic values.

The maturation of the awareness that it is necessary to protect individual freedom and the fundamental values of democratic society from the abuse of high technology and the arbitrariness of political power awakens hope that the Berlin Wall was not torn down in vain. And all our bank employees fit into those two categories.