Home / Comments and Opinions / Countries and Companies Increasingly Choose Partners Geopolitically Closer to Them

Countries and Companies Increasingly Choose Partners Geopolitically Closer to Them

Geopolitika, politika
Geopolitika, politika / Image by: foto

written by: Tomislav Brezinščak, McKinsey 

For some time now, we have been monitoring the state of global trade in our research at McKinsey, and we can conclude that it is reshaping, with the trend being that countries and companies are increasingly choosing to do business with partners who are geopolitically closer to them. For instance, a study titled ‘Geopolitics and the Geometry of Global Trade’ has shown that this has been particularly evident since 2017, when it became clear that countries are trading less with those who are geopolitically distant, and the latest news on tariffs, trade rules, and industrial policy only further raises the level of uncertainty. All business leaders with whom McKinsey employees spoke said the same: today’s trading environment is the most uncertain they have experienced in their careers.

Three Scenarios

In an effort to predict the direction in which global trade will move in the upcoming period, we have developed three most likely scenarios: baseline, diversification, and fragmentation. In the baseline scenario, global trade could grow by about $12 trillion, or 35%, by 2035, totaling $45 trillion. However, if, according to the diversification scenario, companies begin to seek entirely new suppliers, a billion of that growth could disappear, and total growth could decrease by up to $3 trillion if the fragmentation scenario occurs, in which geopolitically distant economies reduce their mutual trade.

Our research ‘New Trade Paradigm: How Changes in Trade Directions Could Impact Business’ has shown that, depending on the scenario, more than 30% of global trade could be redirected from one trade direction to another by 2035. The most significant changes, as expected, would come from the fragmentation scenario, driven by higher tariffs, while trade routes between developing markets could be among the most stable: of the fifty largest current trade routes, sixteen would grow strongly even in the fragmentation scenario, while nine (mostly those connecting developed countries with China and Russia) would sharply decline.

Looking by sectors, the most significant changes would occur in electronics trade, as this chain often connects geopolitically distant economies, making it the most vulnerable. When discussing global trade, most people first think of containers and ships full of goods, but countries exchange much more than that, and moreover, flows related to knowledge and expertise are growing the fastest. Research on ‘Global Flows: The Connecting Tissue of an Interconnected World’ has shown that trade in intangible goods, such as services and intellectual property, grew about twice as fast as trade in goods between 2010 and 2019. In the case of intangible flows, barriers are often not tariffs but regulatory restrictions, licensing requirements, and the like. If fragmentation occurs in this area, differing regulations and the relocation of client businesses can seriously complicate service provision.

What Companies Should Ask Themselves

It is important to be aware that the pattern of growth in global goods trade will not be the same everywhere. For instance, our research revealed an interesting fact: contrary to popular belief, it is not necessarily the case that developing markets will benefit from the diversification scenario. Countries often turn to the next best suppliers through diversification, which means that developing markets already integrated into these networks may profit, while those outside remain sidelined. This has shown us that the potential for export growth in such markets is not much greater compared to the baseline scenario. When looking at different business models, companies should ask themselves several questions: How will changes in trade directions affect our business in the medium and long term, across the various listed scenarios? Which directions will become more important to us, and which less important? What is the actual potential for value creation in those directions that are important to us? Where are we today in relation to that potential, and what can we do operationally and strategically to capture it? What new capabilities and organizational solutions are needed to navigate through this change? Whether it is an equipment manufacturer, distributor, carrier, logistics company, or investor, one thing is certain – changes in trade directions will require skilled management. 

Tagged: