In the next 10 years, by the end of 2034, HOPS plans to invest a total of 2.7 billion euros in the maintenance and development of the electricity grid. This is evident from the proposal of HOPS’s ten-year plan, which HERA has put out for public consultation until mid-September. This plan is revised and amended annually, but it is expected to create a clear picture of the necessary investments in the electricity grid, so that HERA can more accurately determine who will bear the costs and to what extent through the unit connection fee, the adoption of which this agency has been postponing since 2022. The task will not be easy as opinions remain unchanged.
‘Renewables’ insist that the development of the grid should be financed by its operator, while HOPS maintains its earlier proposal to finance it through the unit connection price.
– The ten-year plan for the development of the transmission network, which is approved by HERA and to which the Ministry gives consent, becomes a huge risk for HOPS in terms of the actual realization of the plan over the years without securing the necessary financial resources. The integration of renewable energy sources will represent a significant challenge for HOPS in the upcoming period, and significant financial resources are needed for the preparation and construction of facilities primarily at the 400 kV voltage level (new 400 kV power lines and new 400/x kV substations). In the event of non-acceptance of the unit prices for connecting new users to the grid and increasing the connection capacity of existing users at least in accordance with HOPS’s proposal submitted to HERA during 2023, HOPS will not have the necessary financial resources to build a transmission network that can effectively accommodate production from renewable energy sources. Currently, significant financial resources for the reinforcement and expansion of the transmission network are being invested from EU funds, but for investments around 2030, such a source of financing has not been secured – HOPS explicitly stated in the draft of its Ten-Year Development Plan.
This was also emphasized by the director of the Industry and Sustainable Development Sector of the Croatian Chamber of Economy Marija Šćulac, who warned that the level of investment required for the development of the transmission network does not mean that it is not and cannot be justified. Namely, the development of the grid enables the construction of larger capacities, which fundamentally creates conditions for economic growth that can be easily measured by the increase in energy demand. Ultimately, it also reduces dependence on imports, which is no less important. According to data available to the Renewable Energy Sources Association of Croatia (OIEH), in June of this year, as much as 32 percent of total consumption was imported, and in July, 26.3 percent, while in the first seven months of this year, a total of 1531 GWh of electricity was imported, which is the equivalent of energy that could have been produced if an additional 1845 MW of solar power plants had been built. There are projects that could meet and exceed this energy demand, but their construction requires a more developed electricity grid, and previously a certain unit connection price.
– Ten-year plans rely on a mix of network fees, unit connection fees, and EU co-financing, which we welcome, but at this moment it is impossible to assess what the effects of such a mixed model will be, said Marija Šćulac.
Missed opportunity for the construction of a key power line with NPOO funds
Therefore, regardless of all the good intentions stated in the ten-year plans, the question is how realistic it is that funds will be found for their realization. From OIEH for Lider, they highlighted the example of the Konjsko-Melina power line, which has been mentioned in HOPS’s plans since 2016. However, to date, the route of the power line has not yet entered the spatial plans of all counties through which it will pass. Because of this and the fact that they did not have the necessary project documentation, OIEH states that HOPS could not take advantage of the opportunity to finance its construction that opened up in the NPOO in 2022. In addition to the cost that the unit connection price proposed by HOPS would bring to investors, such examples of administrative sluggishness of state companies and competent authorities are the reason why ‘renewables’ insist that they should not bear the cost of network development.
