The end of a very volatile month is approaching. Along with that, the past and this week have been shortened due to holidays and festivities. Generally, there are not many new developments, but it is not that we advocate for them; there are already quite a few existing factors affecting commodity markets. The order of Trump and tariffs, the order of wars and geopolitics, the order of negative and pessimistic expectations for the near future, all wrapped up in the loss of purchasing power of FIAT currencies. Therefore, it is not surprising to see the movement in the prices of gold, silver, and Bitcoin, new safe havens for currencies. Overall, the market focus is on weather forecasts, trade negotiations between the US and China, information regarding potential negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, and the direction of the US dollar ahead of May.
The US dollar index has fallen by almost nine percent since the beginning of the year. This is its worst start to the year since 1973, when currencies were detached from the gold standard. That was the last major monetary reset; are we waiting for a new one at the end of this year?
The Chinese economy is based on exports, while the US economy is based on consumers. China is trying to shift its economy to one that is more consumer-based, but it is struggling now as consumer sentiment is near record low levels, and its own debt levels are rapidly escalating as Trump’s tariffs dramatically reduce exports, requiring more government funding for stimulus projects.
Chinese fiscal revenue has fallen, while fiscal expenditures have increased, leading to a rise in the fiscal deficit. All this at a time when China continues to struggle in this trade war with increasing levels of fiscal stimulus. It ultimately comes down to who loses the most political capital first, China or the US? There is no pressure from upcoming elections. Xi is president for as long as he wants, and Trump is in his last term. As such, Xi must be concerned about losing the trust of his people, and Trump must maintain the support of his party.
Trump Eases Rhetoric
For his part, Trump must start producing solid evidence that his strategy works. Xi must protect his economy from collapse. The current stalemate is unsustainable. Both need an “exit” that allows them to appear strong in front of their voters. It seems that this “exit” is slowly being found through informal talks taking place behind the scenes. This will not lead to a trade agreement, but it could ease tensions enough to allow the start of those official talks.
Oil prices are more or less unchanged on a weekly basis, below the level of $67/bbl. The main factor is the uncertainty surrounding global trade in general. Although it remains unclear whether official trade negotiations between the US and China have begun, Trump eased his rhetoric last week, and Beijing exempted some US imports from its 125 percent tariffs. However, the potential rise in oil prices is limited by concerns over oversupply. Progress in US-Iran negotiations regarding Tehran’s nuclear program has increased the possibility of a rise in Iranian oil exports if sanctions are lifted. Additionally, the potential for OPEC+ to increase production for the second consecutive month has further contributed to the bearish sentiment.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration has called on Russia and Ukraine to advance peace negotiations following a one-on-one meeting between Trump and Zelensky. Is peace on the horizon? If so, under what (commercial) conditions? The European Union is gradually reducing its energy dependence on Russia, but it still has to work to completely wean itself off fossil fuels. We have reduced imports of Russian gas from 45 percent to 18 percent. We have gone from one barrel of oil for every five purchased to one barrel of oil for every fifty purchased; thus, ten times less. And we no longer import coal from Russia. This was highlighted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The question is only what price (economically and financially) we have paid for this achievement.
