The European financial market regulator is seeking expanded powers to oversee major exchanges and other key parts of the bloc’s financial infrastructure, in an effort to become the European version of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), writes FT.
Verena Ross, chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), stated that ‘there is political will’ within the newly appointed European Commission to centralize the oversight of EU financial markets as part of efforts to revive the weak capital market in the bloc.
– It needs to be assessed in which areas it would make sense to move forward towards centralized EU oversight. We particularly need to consider all systemically important infrastructure entities that operate across borders – Ross told the Financial Times, adding that this would include exchanges, depositary or clearing houses, and settlement systems.
ESMA was established in 2011 with the aim of unifying rules across the EU, but most oversight of financial markets is still conducted by national authorities in the 27 member states of the bloc. Based in Paris, ESMA directly supervises only a few entities, such as credit rating agencies, central depositary houses outside the EU, and benchmark administrators.
The idea of transferring more powers from national authorities to ESMA has gained momentum in recent months, as officials in Brussels seek ways to stimulate activity in capital markets to help finance an estimated 800 billion euros in additional investment needs. Former President of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, identified the transformation of ESMA into a version of the SEC last month as a ‘key pillar’ in strengthening European capital markets in an important report on stimulating economic growth in the EU.
– ESMA should evolve from a body that coordinates national regulators into a single common regulator for all securities markets in the EU – Draghi wrote, giving it oversight powers over large multinational issuers, cross-border financial markets, and all central depositary houses.
Some smaller EU countries, such as Luxembourg and Ireland, oppose this idea, fearing it could undermine their successful financial sectors. However, Ross is convinced that this shift would improve the efficiency of European financial markets for investors and issuers.
– An effective regulatory and supervisory framework has a significant impact on the functioning of the single capital market, and we do not have that in Europe. This is one of the areas we need to focus on – Ross said.
In response to criticism from smaller countries, she emphasized that a gradual approach to building ESMA’s powers is better than attempting to turn it overnight into a powerful European version of the SEC.
– It is about practical thinking. We must not forget that EU markets are quite different from American ones in terms of the diversity of legal systems. Therefore, it is important to establish the role of centralized EU oversight where it currently makes the most sense – she said.
