Home / Business and Politics / Neven Vidaković: The Green Transition is Achieved by Reducing Economic Growth and Resource Consumption

Neven Vidaković: The Green Transition is Achieved by Reducing Economic Growth and Resource Consumption

<p>Neven Vidaković</p>
Neven Vidaković / Image by: foto Ratko Mavar

In the global geopolitical chaos, economic problems such as inflation or growth structure across the EU are often swept under the rug. The same is true in Croatia, where we stress-free concluded elections and continued to rub our hands due to still the highest growth rates, along with yet another expected record season. Indeed, everything is rising—salaries, prices, consumption, optimism—although it is evident that some other issues are rolling under the rug. What is happening, we asked Neven Vidaković, a financial analyst who likes to call things by their proper names.

What will be the ‘drivers’ of growth in the new government’s term? EU money will certainly flow until the end of the decade, and consumption shows no signs of slowing down.

Currently, we are reaping all the benefits of structural inflation at the EU level. The inflow of EU funds will continue for a few more years, but not until the end of the decade. With the decline in standards in the EU, tourism will also decline, and EU funds will suddenly dry up, leading to a drop in GDP. We are currently financing projects with EU funds that cannot bring long-term growth and cannot create economic resilience. Once there are no funds for recovery, there will be no sources of growth, and our production capacities are declining.

Nevertheless, more or less all analysts are satisfied with the growth, which is among the highest in the EU, and we are better than most developed members.

There is no doubt that we have economic growth; the only question is whether we want to have the sources of economic growth that we currently have. Since the beginning of Andrej Plenković‘s rule, GDP has grown by 29.92 percent in constant prices. Of that, tourism and trade account for 40.37 percent, public administration and healthcare 27.49 percent, agriculture 18.29 percent, and manufacturing 16.54 percent. These data are from the end of 2015 to the end of 2023, so the impact of the pandemic is excluded, but the impact of EU funds is included. Public administration has grown almost twice as much as the manufacturing industry. A significant restructuring of the economy has occurred, and of course, it is now less resilient. I repeat, there is no doubt that we have economic growth, but whether we want to have such a structure of the economy is a question for serious economists. We have just become a country that has more employees in trade than in manufacturing.

Part of the numbers is rising due to inflation, which, like GDP, is among the highest in the EU. Will it really melt to 2 percent by 2026, as estimated by the Croatian National Bank? Is the root of inflation the same in Croatia and the EU?

The root of inflation in the EU is the restructuring of the economy due to deglobalization. That is why I speak of structural inflation, not inflation caused by monetary or fiscal policy. Our economy is small and has weak resilience to shocks. Therefore, our inflation rate will always be higher than the inflation rate in the EU; similarly, deflation has lasted longer here. Precisely because of these processes, the reduction in inflation is taking so long. For example, inflation in the US has been practically stable for a year. An example of this process is Spain, where inflation was 1.6 percent in May 2023 and 3.4 percent in June 2024. How could inflation rise if the ECB has been conducting a restrictive monetary policy for a year? Such numbers clearly show that some other process is at work.

The divergence in growth rates and the structure of the economy is becoming quite obvious; what exactly is happening within the EU?

The same thing is happening that occurred in Yugoslavia: inequalities in the economy are rising. All producing countries are having problems. An example is Germany, where industrial production fell by 7 percent year-on-year in June, while all those engaged in services, such as Portugal and Croatia, have excellent indicators. This is the midpoint of structural inflation, just as it was in Yugoslavia. However, after prolonged economic instability, political instability follows. We have crossed that point with the elections in France. From now on, political instability will be much more important than economic instability.

Estimates suggest that around 500 billion euros per year will be needed for the green transition. Banks do not have that money, so the European Commission expects companies to turn to the capital market. Will that happen?

Yes, but the process will not be as successful as the Commission would like. Capital markets need liquidity to function and to finance projects at all. Currently, due to restrictive monetary policy, that liquidity is decreasing, which will make any financing more difficult.

Just as Croatia is beginning to recognize the advantages of the capital market. How much can the state push the domestic capital market by issuing government bonds and treasury bills?

It can do a lot, and the positive effects of development are already visible. The state has issued bonds five times. For the fifth issuance, there was no media hype, which was truly unnecessary; issuing government bonds has become a routine matter. This is a true indicator of development, so it is necessary to continue this trend with the issuance of other instruments.

What else we asked the interlocutor and why he thinks that state debts are currently the biggest problem can be read in the new printed and digital issue of Lider.

The article is available in printed
and digital edition of Lider

Tagged: