Europe has reasons to watch the pre-election campaign in the U.S. with concern and even anxiety. Whenever old Europe has felt insecure, lost, or disoriented in the last eighty years, it has usually looked across the Atlantic for a compass, help, and support.
After the Allied victory in World War II, the U.S. helped old Europe establish a defense system (NATO) and an economic-political alliance (EU), played a key role in ending the wars following the breakup of the former Yugoslavia, expanded NATO and the EU to new members, helped the EU regroup after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and positioned itself in Middle Eastern conflicts. It hasn’t always had a brilliant leader in the White House, but it has had a strong legal order and a balanced political system on which clear leadership has been built.
Lack of Personnel to Work with Trump
Five months before the U.S. presidential elections, the view across the ocean presents a picture of an unprecedented America. A New York jury has convicted former president and current Republican candidate Donald Trump in the first instance for influencing the results of the 2016 election because he bribed the so-called adult actress Stormy Daniels with money to silence her about their alleged sexual affair from 2006! Along with this trial, candidate Trump has three more indictments hanging over him, and it is currently uncertain how his legal saga will unfold until the elections and how it will affect voter sentiment.
So far, it seems that the verdict has further motivated his electoral base, and in Trump, it has strengthened the determination to endure to the end. In the U.S., even final convictions, let alone a potential prison sentence, are not a legal barrier that can stop a presidential candidacy. It is also likely that these processes have not strengthened the impression that everyone is equal before the law, but rather left the impression of political instrumentalization of the judicial system.
In the event of Trump’s victory, the White House will be occupied by a vengeful president, focused primarily on internal American conflicts, which will become even more intense. Despite the expected heightened rhetoric, I do not believe in drastic changes in Trump’s foreign policy, such as withdrawing the U.S. from NATO, handing Ukraine over to Putin, or, on a narrower regional level, that his policy would be determined by political friendship with Viktor Orbán or his son-in-law’s business cooperation with Vučić’s Serbia. I am more concerned about the lack of politicians in the EU, and in Croatia, who know how to work with Trump as an interest-driven businessman and showman, rather than as a bureaucrat in diplomatic gloves. Therefore, misunderstandings and fractures are expected, even greater than in Trump’s first term.
