Home / Comments and Opinions / Iranian attack on Israel is not a prelude to escalation, but to de-escalation of the conflict

Iranian attack on Israel is not a prelude to escalation, but to de-escalation of the conflict

<p>izrael vs iran</p>
izrael vs iran / Image by: foto

Was the three-hour Iranian attack on Israel on the night from Saturday to Sunday a prelude to a new escalation of the conflict and a great war in the Middle East, as it appeared in the media the next morning? Or was it a tactical maneuver agreed upon between the USA and Iran, as more serious analysts of Middle Eastern events warned before the evening? And is this first direct attack by Iran on Israel actually a prelude to de-escalation of the conflict and stronger American oversight over the further course of the Israeli-Palestinian war?

By morning, everyone was celebrating

In any case, it was one of the more unusual wars in the history of warfare, not just in the Middle East. Unlike the Hamas attack and massacre on October 7, which was a complete surprise and shock, not just for Israel, the large Iranian attack was announced, very precisely timed, several days in advance. And so, on the night from Saturday to Sunday, Israelis interested in following the war sat in front of their televisions and watched news about the three hundred rockets and drones that Iran launched towards Israel.

By morning, everyone was already celebrating victory. Iran celebrated because with the large attack on Israel, it avenged the Israeli airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus in early April, in which several high-ranking officers of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard were killed, including General Mohamad Reza Zahedi, who, according to Iranian sources, was the mastermind of the Hamas attack on October 7. Israel celebrated because not a single Iranian rocket or drone hit its target. As much as 99 percent of them were destroyed by Israeli air defense with significant allied assistance (USA, UK, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia), even before they entered Israeli airspace. Palestinians in Gaza celebrated interpreting this Iranian attack as a sign that Iran had not forgotten them. Western political realists would add – after being pushed into war with Israel, in which they are paying a very high price in human lives.

But what actually happened and what are the possible consequences? It seems to me that a very rational explanation of this Iranian-Israeli blitzkrieg was given by Yigal Carmon, a former Israeli military intelligence officer and advisor on counterintelligence issues to several Israeli prime ministers, who now heads MEMRI, a research institute for Middle Eastern media. According to his opinion, it is an agreed American-Iranian operation that is actually a replica of the operation in which Iran ‘avenged’ the USA for the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, responsible for Middle Eastern operations. Namely, after the USA eliminated General Qasem as mastermind of Iranian terrorist operations in January 2020, Iran had to symbolically react to save face. The target was the American airbase Ain al-Asad in Iraq.

It was one of the more unusual wars in the history of warfare, not just in the Middle East. Unlike the Hamas attack and massacre on October 7, which was a complete surprise and shock, the large Iranian attack was announced, very precisely timed, several days in advance

The then president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump revealed this year that Iran had previously announced the attack, promising to target an area outside the base and asking them not to retaliate. Several American officers who were then at the base confirmed that they had been informed in advance about the attack. Iran fired fifteen rockets, and all missed the airbase. The operation ended without dead or injured, only with minor material damage. And without an American response.

Only one explanation

Analogously, Carmon sees the Iranian attack on Israel as an operation agreed upon with the USA, for Iran to symbolically avenge the Israeli liquidation of its generals and other officers of the Revolutionary Guard, but with no one in Israel being killed. And that there would be no Israeli retaliation. Only in this way, by agreement, could it happen, Carmon believes, that Iran launches three hundred rockets and drones towards Israel, and that ‘not even a cat’s tail is injured’. A Bedouin girl, as the only victim of this blitzkrieg, was injured by shrapnel from an Israeli air defense rocket.

If the first direct conflict between Iran and Israel was more staged than fought, it does not mean it is without serious political consequences. The biggest winner is the USA, which has shown that it can negotiate with Iran, that it can deter Israel from responding to the attack, that it can gather NATO allies (UK, France) and Middle Eastern allies (Jordan, Saudi Arabia) in defense of Israel. In short, it is gradually taking control of the Middle Eastern conflict. It has shown Israel that it is not alone in the conflict with Iran and Iranian influences. But that means it will also be less autonomous.

Tagged: