The company Villa Dubrovnik, which owns the luxury hotel of the same name located in close proximity to Dubrovnik’s historical core, has reached a settlement with the Zagreb-based company Europrojekt, leading the Commercial Court in Dubrovnik to terminate the legal proceedings by dismissing the lawsuit against Villa Dubrovnik.
The Zagreb company sought around two million euros after paying one million euros as a deposit for land in Sveti Jakov (return of double deposit), which prompted the Commercial Court to issue a ruling on February 14 to secure a temporary measure prohibiting the alienation and encumbrance of Villa Dubrovnik’s properties. With the achieved settlement, the Commercial Court issued a ruling to delete the encumbrances on Villa Dubrovnik’s properties.
As announced on the Zagreb Stock Exchange, Villa Dubrovnik emphasizes that the successful resolution of the dispute is part of a comprehensive settlement related to the non-operational land in Sveti Jakov, totaling 6,675 square meters, confirmed to be owned by the Dubrovnik tourism company, while Europrojekt was refunded the deposit amounting to one million euros.
Additionally, the announcement states that Villa Dubrovnik, through the exchange and sale of smaller parts of the properties with the owners of neighboring properties (who are in a partnership with Europrojekt and thus part of the broader settlement), has achieved the required minimum area necessary for the development of the planned project of smaller individual luxury accommodation units on all parcels owned by the Company, which had not been the case previously. The purchase and exchange contracts for the properties were concluded on the condition that the holders of pre-emption rights (the city or municipality in relation to the county and the City of Zagreb, and then the Republic of Croatia) would not exercise rights under Article 37 of the Law on the Protection and Preservation of Cultural Goods, which is a terminating condition in the contracts for the exchange and sale of properties, but not in the settlement itself, which is final.
