Managing social media platforms is not an easy task. If you don’t believe us, feel free to ask former Twitter employees whose decision to block the New York Post’s 2020 story about Hunter, the son of Joe Biden, was recently taken up in tweets by Substack writer Matt Taibbi… Or simply ask Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, who praised Taibbi’s tweets filled with screenshots that allegedly show the company’s internal messages.
Despite their billing as evidence of the company’s history of political bias, the records depicted people caught in a trap that now ensnares Musk himself. Now he is the one who must make tough decisions about what to allow on Twitter.
The Involvement of Politics in Twitter
A series of tweets, which Taibbi called ‘Twitter Files’, shows company executives having to make a challenging management move in a very awkward situation. Presidential elections were approaching, and the New York Post reported that a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden contained evidence that he inappropriately attempted to broker a meeting between a business client and his father while Joe Biden was Vice President of the United States.
Emails and messages in the screenshots published by Taibbi show what one executive called a ‘whirlwind’, as some of Twitter’s security officials questioned the initial decision to block sharing the story due to a violation of the platform’s policy on the distribution of hacked materials. It remains unclear what the origin of the laptop is and whether all the files on it truly belong to Hunter Biden.
The screenshots displayed a warning from one employee.
– We will face tough questions about this if we don’t have some solid justification – he wrote.
The company’s lawyer believed it was ‘reasonable for Twitter to assume’ that the material the newspapers obtained was stolen. Other screenshots showed Twitter executives seeking advice from a Democratic member of Congress and a technology industry lobbyist.
What did the world learn about Twitter’s handling of the incident from the so-called Twitter Files? Not much. After all, Twitter reversed its decision two days later, and then-CEO Jack Dorsey said the moderation decision was ‘wrong’. Instead, this topic opened the door to numerous conspiracy theories swirling around the laptop story, including the unsubstantiated claim that government officials intervened to cover up the Post’s story.
