Home / Business and Politics / Solidarity in the EU: Let’s Freeze Together

Solidarity in the EU: Let’s Freeze Together

Even long before this covid-supply-inflation-energy crisis, the economic lag of Europe was visibly apparent. With the Russia-Ukraine war, gas games, and the expected winter freeze, this fact has been cemented and is indisputable like scientific knowledge. Even the 'fact-checkers' of our warm community have verified it. However, instead of the EU addressing this harsh reality, morally binding clichés like solidarity are being pulled out of the hat. Clearly, the famous motto 'liberté, égalité, fraternité' (which, admittedly, has been trampled on for some time) lacked that modern final touch – solidarité. Et voilà, Europe has completely melted into this 'voluntary' social cohesion. It has replaced governance, reason, thinking, planning, tactics, strategy, care, everything that any authority, especially a supranational one, must be capable of doing.

However, when concrete actions are absent, and this is not a recent issue nor one that arose from the pandemic, as the EU has no idea how to connect the traditionally developed north and the traditionally poor south (between which the gap yawns even wider in crises), it is simplest to pull out slogans and point fingers at anyone who does not believe in them.

In this imposed and created covid crisis, we lost income, but we found solidarity. There is not a word about the fact that no one has shown solidarity with those who lost their jobs, businesses, homes, mental and physical health due to the senseless reaction to the virus, because, God forbid, the measures of comparison are not equal. And European solidarity is quite selective. For instance, Ms. Von der Leyen calls for solidarity due to the gas crisis in Europe, because, lo and behold, not all countries rushed to save for others.

Of course, solidarity is necessary, not just a noble idea. The problem arises when crisis management is completely replaced by solidarity. And that is precisely what is happening. The fallacy of such a concept is confirmed by our interlocutors. Political consultant Karlo Jurak states that solidarity as an idea is not only morally elevated but also the foundation for the emergence, survival, and maintenance of a community and society.

– Without solidarity, we do not exist as a society. However, solidarity also implies a relationship among equals; for example, even if I do not have problem X, I will solidarize (in some way) with someone equal to me who has problem Y (because I could also have that problem). This is a simplified formula for the functioning of this timeless value. The perversion of solidarity, on the other hand, occurs when the stronger demand solidarity from the weaker, and that is what is frequently seen in today's use of that term by elites or bureaucratic cynics who think that by invoking 'great ideas' they can maintain their 'smallness' – Jurak emphasizes.

Where solidarity is leading us and what else our interlocutors are saying can be read in the new printed and digital issue of Lider.