In the introductory lecture, chief economist Vedran Šošić from the Croatian National Bank provided an overview of the effects of the pandemic on the economy, asserting that different countries and sectors of the economy were affected differently. Nevertheless, the economy has generally adapted relatively quickly to the changes, although problems exist on both the supply and demand sides, as well as in the labor market. It is not possible to clearly assess how long the problems caused by the pandemic will last, so the key question is when to start withdrawing fiscal support for the economy. He noted that it is unclear who exactly saved during the crisis, but it is likely that savings were pronounced among those with high incomes who will not significantly increase their consumption even after recovery. Residential real estate has maintained its price level despite expectations, unlike commercial properties, and these two factors make predicting recovery uncertain.
Unlike last year’s meeting of governors in Rovinj, which was marked by an atmosphere of uncertainty and pessimism, this one was characterized by a completely different atmosphere. All present governors generally expressed optimism regarding recovery and effectively concluded that it is slowly time for ‘exit strategies’ in terms of fiscal and monetary measures taken during the pandemic, or ‘returning to old problems,’ as stated by the governor of the Croatian National Bank Boris Vujčić.
Indeed, in addition to the optimistic mood, the governors agreed that the issue of economic growth increasingly depends less on fiscal and monetary policy and more on structural reforms. Similarly, most countries in the region, with the exception of Montenegro, generally avoided the worst-case scenario during the pandemic, although experiences understandably vary from country to country. For example, the impact on North Macedonia was severe, despite the solid state of the economy before the outbreak of the pandemic, but through good cooperation between fiscal and monetary policy (support for the economy amounted to seven percent of GDP), the worst was avoided, and now there is a gradual consideration of transitioning from horizontal to targeted measures. The key is to find a balance between prematurely and too late ending measures to avoid pulling the rug out from under the recovery too soon on one hand, and on the other, keeping unviable parts of the economy alive for too long with measures, explained Anita Angelovska Bezhoska, governor of the National Bank of North Macedonia.
Montenegro, which heavily relies on tourism, fared particularly poorly, entering the crisis unprepared due to weak competitiveness and insufficient liquidity. On the other hand, the financial system was in solid condition, which helped to cushion the blow.
– The Central Bank of Montenegro has adopted nine packages of measures, including a moratorium for all banks and clients, transferring the profits of banks from 2019 and 2020 into capital to strengthen the capitalization of banks, and reducing reserves for banks by two percent. This central bank will also slowly begin to withdraw crisis measures, said governor Radoje Žugić.
