The Municipal Civil Court in Zagreb rejected the lawsuit of former president of the Croatian Pure Party of Rights (HČSP) Josip Miljak against Hanza Media as the publisher of Jutarnji List for violation of personality rights and mental anguish due to the publication of the text titled ‘First gay politician laundered money for the HČSP boss’ and the claim for the payment of 35,000 kuna increased by default interest.
Miljak filed a lawsuit in November 2013 regarding the disputed text against Europa Digital d.o.o., one of the former publishers of Jutarnji List before Hanza Media took over Europapress Holding (EPH), stating that ‘inaccurate, untrue and defamatory information’ had been published against him.
The court deemed this claim unfounded, stating that, according to legal provisions, the right to sue for damages, in accordance with general provisions of mandatory law, belongs to a person who has previously requested the publisher to publish a correction of the disputed information or an apology when a correction is not possible.
>>>Former boss and ‘UDBA’ secretary of HČSP confirmed penalties for money extraction
However, upon reviewing the request for the publication of a correction, the court found that it had been addressed to Europa Digital d.o.o., as well as to the editor-in-chief, but that the plaintiff Josip Miljak did not personally sign this request nor was his name printed at the signature place. Therefore, the court considered that Miljak had not proven that he was the one who requested the publisher to publish a correction of the disputed information and that consequently, he does not have procedural active legitimacy to file a lawsuit.
The lawsuit followed after a text in Jutarnji List in which it was stated that the former secretary of HČSP, Vinko Kalinić, ‘a poet from Vis and a declared gay’ as a defendant said that he ‘only received one percent commission as salary’ during his testimony in a criminal proceeding initiated by the State Attorney’s Office due to million-dollar malversations and tax evasion against Miljak and Kalinić.
>>>Court: Manolić’s claim that Karamarko collaborated with UDBA is not defamation
