The expert jury of the Grand PRix of the Croatian Public Relations Association (HUOJ) announced on Tuesday that the “Anticommunicator of the Year” has been chosen as the Bishop of Sisak, Vlado Košić, who is criticized for spreading intolerance and even hatred towards certain political and social groups in Croatia.
Košić was selected among ten individuals who stood out last year for poor public communication and received the award “Šipak of the Year,” the statement said.
In the competition for this “recognition” were also the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy, Entrepreneurship and Crafts, Martina Dalić, Minister of Health Milan Kujundžić, Minister of Demography, Family, Youth and Social Policy Nada Murganić, Members of Parliament Davor Bernardić (SDP) and Željko Glasnović (independent), State Attorney Dinko Cvitan, Rector of the University of Zagreb Damir Boras, President of the HNS Ivan Vrdoljak, and President of the Croatian Football Federation Davor Šuker.
>>>Krešimir Macan, President of the Jury of the Grand PRix HUOJ
– As part of the Grand PRix awards, we select the ‘Communicator’ and ‘Anticommunicator’ of the year to highlight good communication practices, but also to encourage those who do not communicate in this way to work on the openness and constructiveness of their communication, said the president of the jury of the 11th Grand PRix HUOJ, Krešimir Macan.
This year’s task for the jury was not easy. We have gathered quite a few examples of poor communication in the Croatian public space. Some flaws in public relations are common among poor communicators, while others are specific. Most do not foster open communication and do not cope well with new communication tools. The Bishop of Sisak, Vlado Košić, is the best example of this, Macan said.
Košić spread intolerance and hatred
The jury determined that the Bishop of Sisak spread intolerance and even hatred towards certain political and social groups. He did this in sermons, media appearances, and on social networks. Such communication is inappropriate for anyone, and it carries additional weight when it comes from someone in Košić’s position.
Not only did such statements not contribute to building a culture of public dialogue in Croatia, but quite the opposite – he sent messages that were contrary to the mission, vision, and core values of his own organization – the Catholic Church, Macan conveyed the explanation of the fifteen jury members.
