The calming of the previously dominant radical rhetoric, as well as the fact that the current pre-election race is taking place during the summer months, has made this campaign (or at least its first part) more bearable than ever before. I recently went on vacation and followed the media somewhat less than usual, but I have no impression that I missed anything particularly important. Perhaps the only truly interesting moment was the debate between the two party leaders, which went smoothly and politely, and I somehow felt that there was no excessive need to follow all party events closely.
Then, just in the week I returned to Zagreb, ‘cases’ such as the accusations against General Krstičević began to pile up, with him being attacked for having been in the JNA for too long at the beginning of the Homeland War. Setting aside the fact that such demagoguery is completely out of reason and rational political thinking, very quickly after the attack on the right, there was also one on the left in the form of a leaked recording of Zoran Milanović’s meeting with representatives of the defenders. There was quite a stir around the recorded material, although the head of the SDP more or less said what could be expected of him, perhaps just in a too casual language for public discourse, but in terms of content, realistically, few should be surprised. I certainly am not.
I do not think that these two cases will overly harm either side, and the SDP might even benefit from it to raise a percentage (we should still wait for polls and see the consequences of the latest events). However, it is quite symptomatic that these two blows followed one after the other in a very short time, and to be completely honest, I am not entirely sure whether they were fired at each other by the two biggest political players. To be fair, the SDP defended Krstičević through Ranko Ostojić, while the HDZ took the opportunity to call out Milanović. However, Andrej Plenković’s first reaction was far below the slam dunk he could have played, and it boiled down to a few phrases about ‘café dilettantism’. So, nothing too excessive for the rhetoric that is usual during the pre-election game.
The real question is actually who these two cases really benefit and whether they are perhaps connected.
