Croatia needs a new energy strategy as it has been a long time since 2009 in terms of energy policy. This was recently noted by the Minister of Environment and Nature Protection, Slaven Dobrović, while discussing current projects such as Plomin C.
This project, as well as some others, is a matter of both expertise and energy strategy. Whether it will be realized or not depends on this. However, the ‘greens’ will certainly contribute to projects that have been in the news for a long time, such as the project for the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons in the Adriatic. And they will do so united, just as they have so far.
The integral parts of the activist engagement of Green Action are lobbying, public advocacy, and often protest activities. Bernard Ivčić, the president of the Management Board of Green Action, notes that it is often not enough to just lobby; it is also necessary to raise public awareness on a specific topic so that the institution targeted by their lobbying can more easily see that there is public interest in that topic. They use such methods in current campaigns against drilling in the Adriatic, against Plomin C, for a sustainable waste management system, etc. A concrete example from the S.O.S. for the Adriatic campaign is last year’s pressure on OMV, headquartered in Vienna, to withdraw from the Adriatic drilling project and thereby reduce the risk of oil pollution in the Adriatic.
– We connected with a partner organization in Austria that lobbied this company to abandon drilling, explaining various aspects of the project to them. After that, together with our Austrian colleagues, we organized a performance in front of OMV’s headquarters in Vienna. A month later, we also participated in the annual shareholders’ meeting of this company and gave a speech explaining why they should not participate in drilling in the Adriatic. Shortly thereafter, OMV announced that it was abandoning its intention to drill in the Adriatic – Ivčić states, adding that their activities were probably not the only reason for their withdrawal, but they certainly made a visible contribution.
They regularly participate in public discussions on various laws, strategies, and programs where they analyze the proposed document and write comments, striving to improve quality. In some cases, in addition to sending comments, they also initiate campaigns. For example, due to the corrupt Law on Golf Courses, in collaboration with several partner organizations, they organized a series of protest actions and requested the Constitutional Court to assess the legality of the said Law.
