Finance Minister Zdravko Marić stated on Saturday that he expects economic growth of around 2 percent this year, but that there are negative risks to these estimates, primarily due to foreign factors.
– “Our macroeconomic guidelines do not significantly deviate from the recently published EU projections,” said Marić in an interview with Jutarnji list.
The European Commission recently raised its estimate for the growth of the Croatian economy this year to 2.1 percent, up from the previous 1.4 percent. However, Marić warns that “primarily due to foreign factors, risks on the negative side of expectations prevail, among which are the slowdown in growth of the Chinese and American economies, possible interest rate increases in the U.S., and worryingly low oil and raw material prices… In such a situation, he says, the sustainability of public debt is one of the main challenges, where three pillars of adjustment must be considered. The first is fiscal consolidation, i.e., reducing the budget deficit to a sustainable level. The second pillar is the activation of state assets to reduce nominal debt, while the third pillar is strengthening economic activity.
Croatia faces the so-called ‘snowball effect’, or a situation where the cost of financing debts exceeds the nominal growth of gross domestic product (GDP).
– “To cover this difference, the state must maintain a primary surplus, i.e., a deficit reduced by interest, in order to stabilize public debt… We cumulatively need 13 billion kuna in primary surplus over three years,” says Marić.
He emphasizes the risks to public debt if interest rates on global financial markets rise.
– “In the case of an interest rate increase of 1 percentage point, from 4.3 percent that we currently pay, by 2020 we would have to allocate double the amount compared to the 12 billion we currently pay, or another 12 billion kuna,” emphasizes the finance minister.
For this reason, he says, fiscal consolidation is important, and the goal is to achieve a budget deficit of 3 percent of GDP this year. Budget revenues would be planned realistically-conservatively, while expenditures would be influenced by rationalization, efficiency, and savings.
