Home / Comments and Opinions / Will Šustar also run aground on the rocks of ideology?

Will Šustar also run aground on the rocks of ideology?

The amount of scandal that has befallen the newly formed government is so extraordinary, and at the same time journalistically stimulating, that it is hard to compare it to the start of any other government since the young Croatian state came into existence. However, while you could read (and, in fact, still can) about Crnjac and Hasanbegović in hundreds and hundreds of printed pages of journalistic texts, the views of the current Minister of Education and Science have only recently begun to be written about, still discreetly, in the last few days.

As reported by the media, Minister Predrag Šustar stated in an article from 2012 that ‘the question of evolution is still open’ and that ‘the theory of evolution has not provided definitive solutions.’ Such a stance, which has also been abandoned by the official Catholic Church, is more appropriate for some past centuries, but is also extremely concerning when expressed by a person holding the position of the head of such an important sector. To be fair, Šustar’s public appearances are quite polished and far more refined than some other politicians who have recently come into the spotlight, but this background once again shows how Croatia has yet to find a suitable person at the helm of probably the most important ministry.

I say the most important, although no government has perceived it as such so far, since it primarily holds the foundation for the social and economic transformation that we talk about so much. However, the selection of more or less inappropriate and/or incompetent individuals for this function has been going on for too long, and it is quite clear that regardless of the political option, education has yet to come to the center of political interest.

Of course, there is still a theoretical possibility that Šustar may prove to be better in his political actions than in his scientific ones. His first move showed that, if nothing else, he nurtures a conciliatory style as well as a certain inclination towards compromise, which is a virtue to be appreciated in the current increasingly aggressive rhetoric in society. Šustar, namely, after initial announcements that the new government would reject all the work done by the previously formed working group for curricular reform, quickly denied such claims and stated that their work would be respected. Moreover, this week the new minister held his first press conference where he supported the proposed education reform.

The reform foresees, as can be read, changes such as the absence of grading in the first two grades of primary school, flexible scheduling, the introduction of modules instead of professions in secondary schools, as well as learning through work in vocational schools. Somewhat discreetly, but still, contents related to information and communication technologies, health, and entrepreneurship are also being introduced, although without the introduction of special subjects.

It remains to be seen how real or merely declarative this support is, but even if it is indeed sincere, there are two problems.

On one hand, although these are certain shifts, they are still so modest and insufficient in relation to the enormous changes in the labor market that are already taking place, let alone in relation to the time when today’s primary school students will be looking for their first job. The minister has, it seems to me benevolently, called these proposed changes ‘frothy idealism,’ but in light of the changes in education occurring in many of the most advanced countries, these are quite modest, almost minimalist moves. In my opinion, good intentions are not enough here; a broader vision of where we want to be in 10 or 20 years is needed, and how to harness education to achieve that goal, which is something that has absolutely been lacking so far.

The second problem is the question of to what extent the minister in education will promote his ideological framework so vividly expressed in his stance on evolution. In a society as divided as ours, this would be the absolutely worst scenario, as we have already been convinced with ministers of a completely opposite ideological background. Let us remember, after all, Minister Jovanović, who exhausted himself on a whole range of fronts, only for the final effect to be almost negligible. Instead of such fruitless battles that drain energy and precious time, but also reduce broad public support, the main emphasis should be on adapting education to the modern and future demands of the labor market. The ideological framework, on the other hand, can be addressed in some calmer and less heated times.

More than ever, I am convinced that in the current atmosphere of heightened passions, the aforementioned is a basic prerequisite for implementing other, far more important changes in education. Minister Šustar still needs to show that he understands this, as well as that he is capable of rising above his own value framework; otherwise, he will run aground where many of his predecessors have already ended up.