The Croatian economy is in economic stagnation despite some positive signs: the halt of economic decline, growth in exports, industrial production, and personal consumption, as well as good results from the tourist season. In other words, growth this year is primarily a result of increased foreign demand due to the growth trend of the European Union countries with which we trade the most, rather than active macroeconomic policies and the creation of a more stable and favorable business climate or the much-needed change in the model of the existing national economic policy.
As long as economic growth does not exceed the rate of three to four percent, which is necessary just to cover interest payments, we cannot speak of growth and development.
Transferring Problems and Risks
Unfortunately, all structural problems and risks from the recessionary years, during which we lost more than 12 percent of GDP, which we have not managed to resolve or mitigate, are being transferred into the next year, 2016. First and foremost, I am referring to the high budget deficit which, according to the European Commission’s forecasts, we will not manage to reduce to the Maastricht-allowed three percent of GDP even by 2017. Moreover, this year and the next two years, we will be the country with the highest level of budget deficit among all EU countries.
A high deficit pushes public debt to long-term unsustainable levels above 90 percent of GDP with high interest payment obligations that limit the possibility of future growth. In other words, with a growth rate of 1.7 percent, which is projected for GDP, Croatia would only reach the level it achieved in 2008 in seven years.
What 2016 will be like depends on our own capabilities to conduct economic and development policy, but also on developments in the environment on which we, as a small and open economy, are largely dependent. A favorable circumstance is that growth in the European Union is expected to continue, with which we conduct the majority of our foreign trade. At the same time, however, risks related to the economic situation in China and Russia are increasing, a gradual rise in U.S. interest rates is expected, leading to changes in capital flows; there are also significant geopolitical risks (Russia, Syria, Ukraine). Not to mention the refugee crisis for which there is no comprehensive analysis of the actual scale of costs and damage it has caused. A known part of the damage is that which occurred due to the blockade of the border with Serbia, which lasted in various forms for a week. However, in the case of a continuation or intensification of the refugee and migrant crisis, the long-term consequences could be significantly greater, and will only become apparent in the coming years.
