Home / Business and Politics / The Prime Minister Should Be Selected Through a Competition with the Help of Headhunters

The Prime Minister Should Be Selected Through a Competition with the Help of Headhunters

While cannons speak, cows are silent. According to the same logic, while elections are ongoing, business remains subdued, and these two pages are also marked by politics. Entrepreneurs are waiting, managers in state and public companies are anxious, and party favorites have already assembled their new teams and begun to pack into the offices of the previous heads of desirable companies.

Then came Most, and business now stands even more resolutely. The stock market has also stalled. ‘Investors are waiting for an agreement on the government and reforms,’ claims broker Roman Rinkovec. HDZ, SDP, and Most are preparing for supposedly programmatic negotiations, but no one would refuse to lead that, whoever it may be, even a reformist government. By Tuesday, we already had six prime ministerial candidates, including one retiree, and the inflation of candidates will swell during the time of negotiating spins. Indeed, how to choose a prime minister who will not have a compact parliamentary majority? For this reason, he does not need to have the political strength as in the times after Tuđman. Namely, political power will, according to all indications, shift towards the Parliament, which could have a significantly stronger legislative, and especially control function. Therefore, the candidate for prime minister could now be chosen with less political criteria. Thus, a public or invited competition could also be considered. (Because, although elections are fundamentally a political competition, voters could not decide based on facts since neither SDP nor HDZ presented a clear program).

Therefore, the employer (the Parliament, which should be the supervisory board of the new government) will stipulate the conditions and set parameters: the obligation to implement reforms in the judiciary, public administration, and territorial organization… With specific deadlines, along with economic growth that must be at least one percent higher than regional competitors and with a clear stance on public debt, exports, monetary policy… And then a crisis manager is sought, someone like Darko Šket, who managed to pull Pevec out of bankruptcy. When a thousand people apply for that job, headhunters are engaged to assess all candidates according to the harsh rules of the corporate sector – from knowledge of political management to checking foreign languages, intelligence, general culture, psychological tests… One or several names are then forwarded to politicians in the Parliament for final decision-making. In the end, the mandate goes to the one who manages to assemble the best ministerial team. Utopia? Of course, but that is precisely why the corporate sector in Croatia, despite all its major flaws, is significantly more efficient than the state. And that is exactly why the state needs a crisis manager.