Home / Business Scene / Swiss Franc: Interventions in the Monetary System Must Not Be Voluntaristic

Swiss Franc: Interventions in the Monetary System Must Not Be Voluntaristic

Recently, European finance ministers expressed unfavorable opinions regarding the conversion of loans from Swiss francs to euros. The official stance of the European Commission is expected by the end of the month. There should be no illusions that it will be different.

Several Croatian banks and private individuals have requested a review of the constitutionality of amendments to the Consumer Credit Act. It is unrealistic to expect that the Constitutional Court will make a decision before the elections. The guardians of constitutional values are not in a hurry to heat up the pre-election atmosphere.

The further fate of the mentioned Act can go in two directions. If the Constitutional Court annuls the adopted amendments to the Act, loans in francs will remain in unchanged status. In that case, state institutions warn that they have a ‘Plan B’, mentioning a tax on banking activities. For now, the opposition political option does not express what its reaction would be to such a scenario. It is too dangerous, before the elections, to explicitly express oneself on such a hot topic, as they do not know what they will do if power falls into their lap.

Neither are the banks innocent

If the Constitutional Court does not accept the objections to the amendments to the Act, which seems unlikely to me, numerous consequences will arise. Banks will likely continue the legal battle in international instances. Since such legal procedures are lengthy, banks will have to start applying the Act. First and foremost, they face a demanding technical task: recalculating all loan batches from francs to euros, concluding new contracts with loan users, many ambiguities in the implementation of the law, and numerous legal disputes on various grounds.
However, this is the less important part of the problem. More importantly, banks will have to ensure additional kuna liquidity, likely raise active interest rates, ensure balance in foreign exposure, and change their business policies. Considering the high capitalization (around 22.3 percent), the conversion will not seriously jeopardize the capital strength of the banking sector, which will decrease to around 19.7 percent, still above the regulatory requirement.
In the emergence of problems with loans in Swiss francs, banks are not ‘innocent’ and would bear other consequences as well. Primarily, their profitability, which has already decreased in recent years, would be seriously jeopardized. It is estimated that it will take at least three years for banks to compensate for losses based on the conversion. The most important consequence for banks is of a reputational nature, which will make foreign borrowing more difficult for them. There will also be a shift in the lending policy in the domestic market; banks will increasingly orient themselves towards private clients, certainly with higher costs.

The overall effect is unfavorable

In ruling political circles, it is believed that the conversion of loans would bring positive results for debtors in Swiss francs. Such a measure would certainly ease their lives, especially for those from socially vulnerable categories. However, the overall effect of the conversion on the social economy would be extremely unfavorable. Not all consequences can be materially expressed, but the state budget would certainly be a major loser. Revenue from the tax on bank profits would be absent in the next few years. Although not dramatically, state foreign exchange reserves would be jeopardized, which could exert certain pressure on the exchange rate. Furthermore, financing the state would become more expensive in both the domestic and foreign markets due to reduced confidence in the domestic legal system. It should be particularly emphasized that there are unfavorable effects on foreign investments, as without a stable political and legal framework, the trust of potential investors is lost. There are already strong indications that foreign investors are becoming much more cautious. It is significant that Reuters reported on September 21 that foreign investors will think twice before traveling to Zagreb (‘I will make foreign investors think twice about booking a trip to Zagreb’). The adopted amendments to the Consumer Credit Act already have negative effects on the business climate in the country. Of course, the consequences will be greater if the amendments remain in force. This case should serve as a great lesson that interventions in the monetary system must not be undertaken voluntaristically. State institutions, in particular, must more seriously assess the effects on the overall financial system and be more subtle in communication. I believe that serious interventions in the monetary system, even when justified and legal, should never be undertaken during election times.