Croatia has technically exited recession after six years of free-fall in economic activity. The economy has found a new balance on its own, with a loss of about 15 percent of national income and more than 150,000 jobs.
GDP has started to grow slightly. However, Croatia has not, as could be heard from political campaign platforms these days, exited the economic crisis. Moreover, the crisis in the economy and society due to a long-standing recession and incorrect reactions of economic authorities to the decline in economic activity (increasing consumption taxes and anti-market ‘ad hoc’ measures) has deepened. New circumstances, new institutions (new laws), and new expectations have emerged that distance Croatia from an effective market economic system. Namely, every government intervention in the economic system and every ‘correction’ of market relations, of which there have been countless since the beginning of the crisis to today, have created new structures that seek to shift their irrational economic decisions onto all taxpayers. We must be concerned about the constant increase in public spending, the creation of ever-larger deficits in the central government’s accounts, and the growth of public debt.
‘Rescue’ Tailored to Politics
The government has systematically increased its spending despite declining public revenues – this year, central government expenditures will be higher by about 20 billion kuna compared to the last year before the crisis. In six years of recession, more than 60 billion kuna has been spent beyond what the real fiscal capacity of taxpayers allowed. The economic authorities have spent that money almost exclusively in an effort to maintain the ‘status quo’ in the public sector. While dramatic changes and significant adjustments to new market conditions occurred in the private sector, politicians ensured that the public sector felt almost no impact from the crisis by increasing the tax burden. Instead of helping households and private companies, as most (responsible) EU members did at the beginning of the crisis, which today record relatively high growth rates, Croatian politicians chose additional (excessive) borrowing and maintaining wage levels and employment in the public sector.
The balance sheets of most private companies and households are burdened with high debts, and capital reserves are depleted. Economic activity in these two sectors of the economy is slightly stronger this year due to increased foreign demand, a better tourist season, and fatigue from the crisis. However, economic policymakers must not expect a stronger wave of new investments from these two sectors without stronger fiscal incentives.
