Here, unfortunately, is yet another story about the negligence of employees in the Tax Administration, causing entrepreneurs to lose time and credibility in the business world. Thus, a tax official threatened to block the account of one entrepreneur’s company and initiate enforcement, but fortunately, the tax officials realized they had made a mistake and canceled everything. However, not everything went as our entrepreneur would have liked.
Although the name of the entrepreneur and his company is known to the editorial staff, he did not want it to be published; the reason, I believe, does not need to be mentioned. His problem was primarily caused by the officer who handled his case in August and who calculated VAT from April instead of July, which amounted to thirty thousand kuna for his company at that time. This money was supposed to be paid into the state budget in May, but in that month, his company imported production machines. Due to the purchase of these machines, when calculating VAT, the state was supposed to refund him VAT of fifty-five thousand kuna. After he ‘offset’ that claim from the state with the April debt to it, it turned out that the state owed him twenty-five thousand kuna.
Acknowledged the Mistake
However, the officer who overlooked the state’s debt to the company did not think so, and the Tax Administration ordered Fina to block the entrepreneur’s company account with the threat of enforcement. As per the rule, Fina sent a warning to the entrepreneur (we have written in this column that enforcement could occur without prior warning) that the account would be blocked and enforced upon the first inflow of funds.
Having no idea what debt was being referred to, the entrepreneur rushed to Fina, and after learning that he owed VAT from April, he quickly went to the Tax Administration to explain that things were quite different. He stated that he had no complaints about the behavior of the employees in the Tax Administration; they were even very polite. When he presented the documents to them, they realized that their colleague had not been diligent and that the request for account blocking was unfounded. They firmly promised him that the problem would be resolved and that the state would fulfill its obligation to him. Satisfied that everything went so smoothly, he left the Tax Administration.
