Home / Lifestyle and Trends / Don’t Believe Everything You Read

Don’t Believe Everything You Read

With the new issue of the weekly Lider, we bring you a special supplement – The Future of Media – dedicated to the upcoming Weekend Media Festival.

About the fulfillment of the old (allegedly) Chinese curse ‘may you live in interesting times’, which Robert Kennedy spoke about during the Cold War era, any contemporary politician from the New or the troubled Old World could also speak. In fact, some will argue that this era is ‘the most interesting’ in history if we do not only mean technological achievements that are (logically) at their peak, life with one foot in the real world and the other in the virtual, the ease of achieving Warhol’s fifteen minutes of fame, but also the horrors that undermine the foundations of modern civilization, from unrest in the Middle East, Islamist threats, refugee crises to the collapse of ideals about a perfect European society or democracy.

Trends Instead of Headlines

Most Earthlings feel that the world as we know it is coming to an end, which, of course, causes unrest and insecurity, to some extent even paranoia. However, as Harvard professor and author of the book ‘The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined’ Stephen Pinker claims, this impression does not correspond to the facts; it is created by superficial and sensationalist media, of which there are now the majority. The author does not blame only traditional media but also millions of amateur war reporters and ‘opinion makers’ hidden behind Facebook and Twitter profiles for biased reporting on the state of affairs. His message would roughly be: ‘Instead of headlines, follow trends; instead of counting victims in your neighborhood, count them in other parts of the world, and you will realize that the world is indeed ‘in a banana’, but less so than it was in some other historical era.’

Filtering the Image

Pinker does not downplay the horrors of which we have recently been direct witnesses (the refugee crisis), but warns of the need for rationalization, filtering the image created by some traditional media and social networks, sometimes for political purposes, sometimes to increase readership or viewership. A smart information user is expected to take on the role of a sort of editor who will know how to separate the irrelevant or inaccurate from the valuable, analyze the theses presented in detail, and ultimately form an opinion on the actual state of affairs by including their own brain. After all, would the refugee crisis have unfolded in such a calm and humane atmosphere if compatriots had uncritically relied on sensationalist headlines that played on the card of sensationalism, paranoia, and conspiracy theories instead of their own experience and intelligence?