The traditional banking approach, which offers clients a large number of complex financial products and services with many variations in price and other conditions, is not optimal in today’s time.
Today, clients are becoming increasingly demanding and insist on greater transparency and simplicity in offerings, while the regulation of the banking system is becoming more dynamic, says Toma Ćukić, a manager at A.T. Kearney for the SEE region.
Consultants from this firm have determined in a global study titled Reducing Complexity in Banking: Simple Always Wins that merely simplifying the portfolio of products and services and better focusing banks on offerings tailored to client needs could result in a reduction of cost share in bank revenues by as much as 25 percent (see Figure 1), which would enhance bank profitability.
A large number of products and services in the offering results in high costs at all levels of the bank’s system, especially in the branch network (front office), where a large number of employees are needed who spend most of their working time merely explaining the products offered to clients. Thus, as much as 75 percent of total processing costs is attributed to work in branches. However, other parts of the system that must deal with maintaining a large number of products (middle and back office) also generate unnecessarily high costs. Such a product mix significantly burdens banking IT systems,” stated Ćukić.
According to him, it is not unusual for a bank to have more than 500 different products and services in its portfolio, two-thirds of which are outdated products and services that are neither sold nor generate new revenues.
– An overly complex portfolio does not only affect costs. It also leads to a reduction in potential revenues from new products and services that the bank introduces. Namely, when a client cannot clearly discern what exactly makes a particular product more expensive than another, banks often resort to the simplest solution to make the new product thrive in the market – offering discounts. Although discounts on new products are often tied to a specific period, after that period expires, banks in most cases, out of fear of losing clients, refrain from raising prices,” adds Ćukić.
Such a way of forming offerings is focused on products, not on clients and their needs, leading to higher costs and loss of revenue, and also results in a loss of client patience as they cannot discern a transparent, clear, and comparable offer as they wish in a complex product offering. Ćukić also warns that a dispersed and uneven offering negatively affects the efficiency of the risk management system.
In A.T. Kearney’s study, banks are recommended to simplify their offerings, which leads to greater profitability in three steps:
1. Banks need to ‘clean their attics’
At A.T. Kearney, an overly complex portfolio of products and services offered by banks is viewed as a cluttered attic of a house that needs to be cleared out. This implies initiating a detailed analysis of all products and services offered in light of the number of users, revenues, and costs they generate. The results of this analysis will show what should remain in the offering and what can simply be deleted. According to A.T. Kearney’s findings, this method can reduce the portfolio of products and services by more than 30 percent.
