The last few months before Croatia’s entry into the EU will be remembered for a series of irrational situations that marked the economic everyday life in Croatia.
Inspired by them, more and more bloggers and social media users are using the term Absurdistan as a new synonym for Croatia. If you didn’t know, this term is used to describe a country where absurdity has become the norm, especially in government bodies and authorities. It is a term that was once used for some former states of the Soviet Union, which today’s situation in Croatia irresistibly resembles. In this sense, I would particularly highlight two situations that have caused astonishment or at least confusion among entrepreneurs and the aware part of the Croatian population.
Who is responsible for Srđ The first situation, which certainly positively marked this period, is the failure of the referendum to demolish the investment at Srđ. To summarize. An investor who knows the environment well invests 100 million euros over several years buying private construction land, but when he wants to realize the investment, he finds a dozen destructive individuals trying to convince the local population to stop the investment through a referendum. Fortunately, the majority of the historically wise Dubrovnik population did not fall for this, so the referendum failed. The absurdity in this situation is that the Government, with its uneven and partial support for the investment at Srđ, left room for retreat in case the referendum succeeded (except for Minister Lorencin, who has experienced similar situations multiple times in Istria). I wonder, if the primary goal of the Government is to increase investments that are crucial for the recovery of the economy, why then did it not unreservedly support this investment and explicitly stand on the side of the investors? Fortunately, the investment at Srđ is starting soon. However, such a Government stance and restraint in supporting investors have made potential investors suspicious. Recently, in a casual conversation with serious investors considering investing in Croatia, I heard a comment from one of them: ‘If Maja (Ruth Frenkel) – who is very well informed, knows the environment, is locally networked, and has her own money – had so many problems and inconveniences, what awaits us in the realization of the investment.’
