Home / Comments and Opinions / How Croatian Unions Missed the Point Again

How Croatian Unions Missed the Point Again

One really has to wonder lately, is there anything in this country that is ‘as simple as beans’, so that finally Croatian absurdity, at least in one single case, really makes sense, and does not turn out to be meaningless nonsense? There isn’t, of course, which is best illustrated by the vigorous reaction of the already well-known unions to the government’s decision to significantly reduce pensions for those who go into early retirement and to equalize the years required for old-age pensions between men and women. Out of a hundred million, billion things that should raise a voice, organize people, protest, scream, hit and strike, Croatian unions manage to choose the most nonsensical every time. From working on Sundays, a pure own goal, to whining about poor clerks in public services and discrediting employees in the private sector, to this latest howling, Croatian unions simply refuse to attract a relevant number of angry people and gather a wide range of employees around common themes.

The cause of this is probably the same as everywhere else in the country, negative selection of people who either really do not understand what they are dealing with or pretend to be foolish for some more prosaic reasons. The fact that I always see the same faces in the same situations with the same story suggests that these people actually know very well what they are doing, and they do absolutely nothing for me, as a worker and thus the only subject of their interest and attention. The aforementioned government decision does not need to be overly commented on because the pension system, over which concerned unions lament, is on the verge of collapse, NOT due to officials’ pensions, but, among other things, due to the army of prematurely retired people, many of whom are quite healthy for a few more years of work. It is entirely justified to discourage early retirement because, in the end, it is paid for by those who cannot afford to stop working so easily.

Likewise, the equalization of women and men, I have been taught all my life, is one of the most valuable achievements of social progress, so it is hard for me to understand why it is perfectly fine for that equality to exist only when it suits someone. What stands is that the fat cats should not be given the same but more, but that simply does not mean that blanket criticism of everything the government does, no matter how catastrophic and pathetic it may be, is a logical reaction. Yes, officials’ pensions should be brought in line with all others, but that has nothing to do with discouraging early retirement, nor with equalizing men and women.

To ensure that their fight for all the wrong things is not completely detached from reality and meaning, they threw in some smart remarks, saying that reducing unemployment benefits will certainly not stimulate job searching because there are really no jobs. Having learned a little from them, I tip my hat to at least one statement that goes in the direction of defending the welfare state and workers’ rights and which truly reveals the misguided moves of a completely incompetent government that, with such unions and citizens, will have more than enough time to distort the state beyond recognition.