Dun & Bradstreet, the oldest credit rating agency in the world, has created a Formula One index that ranges from 1 to 100 and explains the financial stability of Formula 1 teams. ‘In calculating D&B, demographic and financial data as well as data on payment delays of the teams’ obligations were taken into account. On a scale from 1 to 100, a value of 1 indicates an extremely high possibility of bankruptcy, while a value of 100 indicates minimal risk,’ said Veljko Drakulić, director of Bonline.
The financial stability of F1 teams has deteriorated at the beginning of the new season. This is a result of high investments that have put pressure on the teams’ financial reports. Only Williams and Toro Rosso are financially more stable compared to the previous year due to strict cost control. On the D&B F1 index, Williams occupies the first place, achieving a maximum score of 100 points for the first time. Following them are Sauber with 96 points, Toro Rosso with 92, Mercedes-Benz with 85, and Red Bull with 83 points.
Formula 1 as a Future Profit Center?
Sponsors have started investing more in Formula 1. The combination of Michael Schumacher and Mercedes-Benz seems very attractive. Mercedes and Authonomy, a global software company, signed a two-year contract without much PR before the race in Malaysia. This is the second major sponsor to join F1 after Red Bull’s rival Monster. Media reports indicate that Deutsche Post is also interested in sponsorship, which would mean that Mercedes-Benz is approaching its goal – to become a profit center.
The best teams are financially stable, but they are late in paying obligations: Ferrari (76), Renault (70), and McLaren (51) are at the bottom of the table according to financial data. McLaren stands out particularly, having had 78 points last year, but due to reduced investment from Mercedes, it has fallen to 51 points. These three teams are at the bottom of the rankings due to poor payments to their suppliers. Ferrari’s creditors have to wait 16 days after the agreed deadline to receive their funds, while last year they had to wait 11 days. On the other hand, Renault’s team is late in payments by a maximum of five days after the agreed deadlines. McLaren is trying to mitigate its poor financial position by improving payments compared to the previous year. Their average delay has decreased from 26 days (spring 2009) to 14 days from the agreed deadlines.
