Although they do not fight their battles in the mud and before a mass audience, their influence on culture and lifestyle is at least welcome
Written by: Sandra Babić
In the 1960s, a considerable number of young Earthlings tucked a daisy flower behind their ears, let their hair down, and set off to fight for a better world. Their intention was to dethrone elitists and aristocrats, establishing a reign of free love and peace. And they succeeded. Rock’n’roll ceased to be perceived as a transmitter of satanic messages, taboos became subjects of public discussion, and living according to fundamental human values replaced living according to imposed, completely unnecessary social norms. The hippie culture truly marked a turning point in human history, and it seemed that things would roll just as they should. However, things are changing.
Recommendation
Predominantly snobbish ‘sites’*
The Wire
Richard Hell
James Wolcott
The Wire
Panopticist
Pitchfork Media
Ben Schott
Criterion Collection
Serious Eats
Pullquote
*Recommendation by David Kemp, journalist and founder of snobsite.com
Unified muff
Perhaps the level of change could best be illustrated by the statement of director Ang Lee, who during the filming of the famous Woodstock encountered the impossibility of finding the right muff, the kind worn by unruly hippie girls. Nature was replaced by synthetics, and such multiplication of the same style on women’s groins became a symbol of much worse things – mass production of unified content, from food to art. Hippies, today’s ‘baby boomers’ are likely appalled by this mass culture that neither changes nor inspires, but is there to be chewed and digested like some burnt toast on a spoiled stomach. Of course, they are not the only ones who would express their rebellion against the reign of quasi-celebrities and reality shows, as their historical rivals – the snobs – come to their aid.
Multilayered snobbery
Although they do not fight their battles in the mud and before a mass audience, their influence on culture and lifestyle is at least welcome. And since some might raise an eyebrow at this thesis, it would be worth untangling the definitions of snobs, grappling with categories and subcategories of snobbery. Namely, to be a snob in principle means to be someone who considers themselves, their knowledge, or their status superior, and according to what is written in books, one can become such by birth, due to life circumstances, but also through education. Some snobs transform their superiority into intolerance, others into unfounded arrogance, while there are those whose snobbery can truly be constructive for both members of elite circles and for completely ordinary people, and as such does not have to carry entirely negative connotations. However, such individuals are a completely endangered species, and their place in the perception of the average Croat has been replaced by the snobbery of Ante Gotovac, Željko Kerum, or Silvio Berlusconi, who only associate the term with their imagined superiority, rather than elegance or knowledge, which should be the fundamental characteristics.
Snobbery as a reference
However, besides such quasi and destructive snobs, there are those who can truly change the world with ease and certainly leave a mark on popular culture and in the media. For instance, recently, ‘blogging’ in the beauty industry has been gaining strength, and to attract users so that they click on their name among countless others, amateurs and critics have attached the word ‘snob’ to their names. It has simply begun to be taken for granted that a ‘beauty snob’, ‘bagsnob’, or ‘blacksnob’ knows more about the field than the competition, and whether they might be pretentious or arrogant does not matter, at least something can be learned from them.
