Retirees’ earnings from work under contracts for services, thus outside of their pension, will not be subject to contribution payments starting January 1. Only 25 percent income tax will be calculated from the gross earnings.
Written by: mr. sc. Marija Zuber, advisor-editor at the magazine Accounting and Finance
[email protected]
As of January 1, 2009, the new Law on Contributions comes into effect, regulating the obligation to pay contributions for mandatory social insurance for all categories of insured persons in pension and health insurance. The law regulates the contributors to the payment of contributions and prescribes rates, deadlines, and other issues related to the method of determination, payment techniques, and control of the settlement of this form of mandatory public levies. The most important novelty introduced by the Law on Contributions is the exemption from paying contributions on the second income earned by retirees. The exemption is introduced without amount limitations and regardless of the legal basis on which the retiree earns the second income.
Thus, earnings from the second income that retirees earn from work under contracts for services, as members of supervisory boards, management councils, and other similar bodies, as acquirers, agents, or on any other basis, will not be subject to contribution payments starting January 1. Only 25 percent income tax and possible surtax will be calculated and withheld from the gross earnings. It is estimated that this new relief will cover between 40,000 and 50,000 current pension beneficiaries who earn additional income alongside their pension.
No contributions will be paid on the earnings that will be paid to retirees, neither for pension insurance, which according to the law burdens the income recipient, nor for health insurance, which is calculated as a contribution on the basis and burdens the payer. Assuming that the previously agreed gross second income remains unchanged after January 1, 2009, the tax base will be slightly increased because there is no obligation to pay contributions for pension insurance, which reduces the base for calculating income tax, but the net amount of the second income paid to the retiree will still be higher. Income tax continues to be paid at a rate of 25 percent.
Free Negotiation of Compensation Amount
This method of sharing the benefits of new fiscal exemptions, whereby the exemption from paying contributions from income is directed in favor of retirees, and the exemption from paying contributions on the base is in favor of the payer, is not mandatory. Earnings that retirees earn based on the second income have a legal basis in mandatory law that allows contracting parties to freely negotiate the amount of compensation for work or services delivered based on a contract for services or some other named or unnamed contract. Contracting parties can determine the amount of compensation in gross or net amounts, either for the entire completed job or by months, by days, as a percentage of some amount, per piece, etc. When negotiating the amount of compensation after January 1, it will be particularly important for both contracting parties to know the insured status of the recipient of the second income, as this depends on the fiscal burden of their earnings.
And Home-Based Work Without Contributions
Retirees who perform home-based work or secondary occupations based on a decision issued by the authorized county office for economic affairs will also be exempt from the obligation to pay contributions starting next year. According to the Crafts Act, retirees can open home-based work or provide services in a secondary occupation without suspending their pension payments. Until the end of 2008, although retired, they were obliged to pay both contributions and income tax from home-based work and secondary occupations, and starting next year, they will only be tax payers for those incomes.
When it comes to compensation that retirees will earn as members of certain bodies, where their compensation is regulated by a tariff or decision of the competent authority, those bodies may be encouraged to reconsider the method of determining the tariff (for example, retirees appointed as jurors, members of supervisory boards, management councils, or other corresponding bodies of other legal entities, members of representative bodies in local government units, etc.). If the amount of compensation is determined uniformly for all members of a certain body, regardless of whether the member of that body is a retiree or not, the compensation determined in gross amount will result in a higher net payment to the retiree compared to other members of the same body. Conversely, when the compensation is determined at the level of net income, the recalculation to gross amount will not be the same for retirees and for persons who do not have the right to exemption from paying contributions when receiving second income, so the total costs for the payer will be lower for the retiree compared to other members of the same body. This new way of regulating mandatory contributions could prompt the competent authority or body to discuss the justification of a uniform tariff for all members of the same body.
Exemptions Only for ‘Real’ Retirees
Regarding the application of this new fiscal exemption, it should be emphasized that the definition of a retiree has been narrowed according to the Law on Contributions in relation to pension regulations and in relation to income tax regulations. According to the Law on Contributions, a retiree is considered to be a person who is a pension beneficiary and is not simultaneously in an employment relationship and does not perform self-employment. If it is a person who is half-time retired and the other half in a part-time employment relationship, that person is not considered a retiree under the new contribution payment regulations.
