Even the 700 billion dollars allocated in the U.S. government’s legislative proposal for bank bailouts will not be enough to prevent further weakening of the economy, judging by experiences from similar desperate measures over the past twenty years, writes the Associated Press.
The agreement reached on Sunday between the U.S. government and Congressional leaders regarding a 700 billion dollar plan to rescue the financial system has brought relief to investors worldwide, but recovery from financial crises, which are so dangerous that politicians dare to rescue banks at the expense of taxpayers, usually takes years.
For example, when the government rescued the savings and loan industry in a similar manner in August 1989, the problems did not disappear overnight. Stock prices fell another 12 percent over the next 14 months, while the economy fell into a recession that lasted eight months, starting in July 1990. There is little reason to believe that this time will be different, given that it is difficult to value the illiquid assets that the government will buy from banks and that the U.S. economy is on the brink, if it is not already in recession.
Politicians believe that removing illiquid assets from banks’ balance sheets will allow those banks to raise fresh capital, and that this money will improve conditions in the credit market. For months, banks have been very cautious in approving new loans because they are either in losses or do not want to take risks by approving new loans. As a result, liquidity in the interbank money market has decreased, as has lending to individuals and business investments. However, as companies face declining sales due to the weakening economy and stricter lending conditions due to the credit crisis, further increases in unemployment in the U.S. can be expected. This could pose further problems for banks, as the unemployed will not be able to pay loan installments, and companies will not invest under such conditions.
Although this is the largest government intervention in the market since the Great Depression of the 1930s, it will take, at best, two years for the economy to recover, as was the case in Sweden, says Jonathan Macey, a professor at Yale University. In the early 1990s, the Swedish government spent about 10 billion dollars to save banks from losses caused by falling real estate prices. Before the measures yielded results, the Swedish economy was in recession for 20 months, about 60,000 companies went bankrupt, real estate prices fell by 19 percent, and stock prices fell by 45 percent from their record levels.
